I always knew it was bollocks

The Discourse of Paradigm: Postdeconstructivist theory and neotextual nihilism
O. John Abian
Department of Semiotics, Stanford University

1. Contexts of genre
In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the distinction between opening and closing. It could be said that Bataille uses the term ‘postdeconstructivist theory’ to denote not narrative, but subnarrative.

An abundance of discourses concerning a patriarchial paradox may be revealed. But the subject is contextualised into a that includes culture as a totality.

Sontag suggests the use of neotextual nihilism to challenge sexual identity. It could be said that the primary theme of the works of Rushdie is not modernism, as postdeconstructivist theory suggests, but submodernism.

2. Rushdie and neotextual nihilism
The main theme of Parry’s[1] model of capitalist neocultural theory is the absurdity, and eventually the rubicon, of capitalist society. Derrida uses the term ‘neotextual nihilism’ to denote the role of the writer as observer. Thus, if postdeconstructivist theory holds, we have to choose between neotextual nihilism and subtextual discourse.

Lacan uses the term ‘postdeconstructivist theory’ to denote the difference between language and society. In a sense, a number of narratives concerning neotextual nihilism exist.

In Finnegan’s Wake, Joyce denies capitalist objectivism; in Ulysses he examines neotextual nihilism. It could be said that capitalist neocultural theory implies that class, perhaps ironically, has significance.

Marx uses the term ‘postdeconstructivist theory’ to denote the role of the participant as observer. However, Hanfkopf[2] holds that we have to choose between capitalist neocultural theory and material discourse.

3. Postdeconstructivist theory and Lacanist obscurity
“Sexual identity is intrinsically used in the service of the status quo,” says Marx. Lacan promotes the use of neotextual nihilism to deconstruct capitalism. Therefore, the characteristic theme of the works of Joyce is a mythopoetical reality.

The primary theme of von Ludwig’s[3] essay on postdeconstructivist theory is the meaninglessness, and some would say the fatal flaw, of precapitalist art. If Foucaultist power relations holds, the works of Joyce are reminiscent of Fellini. Thus, the subject is interpolated into a that includes reality as a whole.

The main theme of the works of Joyce is the role of the poet as observer. However, Debord’s analysis of Lacanist obscurity suggests that narrativity may be used to oppress minorities, but only if truth is equal to reality; if that is not the case, reality comes from communication.

The subject is contextualised into a that includes sexuality as a totality. Thus, the characteristic theme of Long’s[4] critique of constructive postsemioticist theory is the paradigm, and eventually the rubicon, of capitalist class.

Marx uses the term ‘postdeconstructivist theory’ to denote the bridge between society and sexual identity. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a that includes reality as a reality.

Lacan suggests the use of postdeconstructivist theory to read and analyse truth. But Tilton[5] holds that we have to choose between subtextual deappropriation and the capitalist paradigm of reality.

4. Narratives of collapse
In the works of Madonna, a predominant concept is the concept of premodern reality. The subject is contextualised into a that includes consciousness as a paradox. However, Baudrillard uses the term ‘postdeconstructivist theory’ to denote not, in fact, narrative, but subnarrative.

“Class is dead,” says Marx; however, according to Werther[6] , it is not so much class that is dead, but rather the fatal flaw, and thus the defining characteristic, of class. The futility, and some would say the rubicon, of Lacanist obscurity prevalent in Madonna’s Material Girl emerges again in Erotica, although in a more neocultural sense. But the primary theme of the works of Madonna is a self-supporting whole.

The characteristic theme of Wilson’s[7] essay on textual narrative is the role of the participant as reader. In JFK, Stone deconstructs Lacanist obscurity; in Heaven and Earth, although, he affirms neotextual nihilism. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a that includes reality as a paradox.

In the works of Stone, a predominant concept is the distinction between within and without. If prematerial patriarchialist theory holds, the works of Stone are not postmodern. Therefore, any number of deconstructions concerning not situationism as such, but subsituationism may be discovered.

The masculine/feminine distinction depicted in Stone’s JFK is also evident in Platoon. But the premise of Lacanist obscurity implies that culture is capable of truth.

The main theme of the works of Stone is the defining characteristic of preconceptual sexual identity. Thus, Debord promotes the use of structuralist deconstruction to attack sexism.

The subject is contextualised into a that includes truth as a whole. But Sargeant[8] suggests that the works of Stone are an example of mythopoetical rationalism.

Sartre suggests the use of capitalist discourse to challenge narrativity. Therefore, Lacan uses the term ‘neotextual nihilism’ to denote a self-falsifying reality.

Debord promotes the use of the postcultural paradigm of reality to deconstruct class divisions. However, Derrida uses the term ‘postdeconstructivist theory’ to denote not theory, but subtheory.

The example of structuralist libertarianism prevalent in Stone’s Natural Born Killers emerges again in Heaven and Earth, although in a more mythopoetical sense. It could be said that if neotextual nihilism holds, we have to choose between Lacanist obscurity and Sontagist camp.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Parry, N. R. (1989) Neotextual nihilism in the works of Joyce. And/Or Press

2. Hanfkopf, F. J. W. ed. (1975) The Broken Key: Pretextual situationism, rationalism and neotextual nihilism. Oxford University Press

3. von Ludwig, I. D. (1984) Neotextual nihilism and postdeconstructivist theory. Panic Button Books

4. Long, T. ed. (1993) The Expression of Absurdity: Neotextual nihilism in the works of Madonna. Schlangekraft

5. Tilton, N. S. (1981) Postdeconstructivist theory and neotextual nihilism. Panic Button Books

6. Werther, I. ed. (1974) Capitalist Desituationisms: Neotextual nihilism and postdeconstructivist theory. University of North Carolina Press

7. Wilson, M. U. P. (1997) Neotextual nihilism in the works of Stone. O’Reilly & Associates

8. Sargeant, F. I. ed. (1976) Deconstructing Constructivism: Postdeconstructivist theory and neotextual nihilism. Harvard University Press


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link. If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 3178224 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational. It is being served from a machine in Seattle, Washington, USA.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks”. An on-line copy is available from Monash University.

More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.



http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/